WARMING IS FOUND TO DISRUPT SPECIES
As other articles presented on New York Times, this specific article also has the purpose to inform the audiences with the matter of global warming that is imminent in the present days. The article could provoke readers to think more about the seriousness of the global warming. This article certainly isn’t biased against anything, for it states many professionals and their quotes, which shows its authorities (and authorities in most cases are not prejudiced against anyone). The affect of this article is to enlighten the environmental status on Earth with excessive carbon dioxide emission.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE2DB103FF931A35752C0A9659C8B63
Science Panel Calls Global Warming ‘Unequivocal’
The article states numerous quotes from those who approve their social state, in other words, they do care what they say to the public, which help us to escalate our credibility to the quotes. Moreover, this article contains tenable report results such as ‘Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change’ and ‘World Meteorological Organization’. This evidences tells that it is extremely difficult to be prejudiced against anything, especially when the article states its direct specific source as their support. The purpose of this article is to ensure the popularity, once again, that the dispute over global warming should meet its end, and be sure with the environmental crisis. Global warming is true and its calamity is severely affecting us. The author’s intention must have been something related to convincing the audiences in terms of bettering our deteriorating environment.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/03/science/earth/03climate.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=science%20panel%20calls%20-
global%20warming%20&st=cse&oref=slogin
As other articles presented on New York Times, this specific article also has the purpose to inform the audiences with the matter of global warming that is imminent in the present days. The article could provoke readers to think more about the seriousness of the global warming. This article certainly isn’t biased against anything, for it states many professionals and their quotes, which shows its authorities (and authorities in most cases are not prejudiced against anyone). The affect of this article is to enlighten the environmental status on Earth with excessive carbon dioxide emission.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE2DB103FF931A35752C0A9659C8B63
Science Panel Calls Global Warming ‘Unequivocal’
The article states numerous quotes from those who approve their social state, in other words, they do care what they say to the public, which help us to escalate our credibility to the quotes. Moreover, this article contains tenable report results such as ‘Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change’ and ‘World Meteorological Organization’. This evidences tells that it is extremely difficult to be prejudiced against anything, especially when the article states its direct specific source as their support. The purpose of this article is to ensure the popularity, once again, that the dispute over global warming should meet its end, and be sure with the environmental crisis. Global warming is true and its calamity is severely affecting us. The author’s intention must have been something related to convincing the audiences in terms of bettering our deteriorating environment.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/03/science/earth/03climate.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=science%20panel%20calls%20-
global%20warming%20&st=cse&oref=slogin
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기