Coral Reef needs a desperate help with global help. This article provokes the readers to think about the carbon dioxide emission that we produce in daily life, which eventually cause global warming. Also the intention of author for writing this articles is to acknowledge the readers to know the severity of global warming, affecting the environment around us. Again, this article portrays the message that all of us should decrease the use of carbon dioxide emitting substances to save our natural environment, in this case, coral reef. Also I find no evidence of prejudice from this article. The reason for no bias from this article is probably because the subject itself is about global warming, only including the natural and the human nature and their act. In other words, there are no two parties to be biased against; if there is, human beings would be only one to be biased. And in the end, it is evident that global warming crisis is due to people’s fault.
Xcel to Disclose Global Warming Risks
The article is from the New York Times, which definitely gives the credibility for society. Personally, the name of the newspaper first gives me trust. This newspaper has online homepage, allowing people in all over the world to have access, and offline physical newspaper. Because the newspaper articles are worldwide open to all people, all articles should have gone through severe censorship before published.
This message is giving the public or specifically, the coal-fired power plants builder, another warning, to be cautious of our spending on the waste matter that harms the globe as a whole.
If I were one of the mass producers of the coal-fired power, I would be cautious of my business, for it is greatly affecting the world.
From my perspective, there is no bias evident in this article. All it does is notifying with the updated information on global warming. Therefore I can conclude that this specific article shows no prejudice against any party.
This message is giving the public or specifically, the coal-fired power plants builder, another warning, to be cautious of our spending on the waste matter that harms the globe as a whole.
If I were one of the mass producers of the coal-fired power, I would be cautious of my business, for it is greatly affecting the world.
From my perspective, there is no bias evident in this article. All it does is notifying with the updated information on global warming. Therefore I can conclude that this specific article shows no prejudice against any party.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기